Governing Creative Direction
Why creativity does not scale without discipline
​
Most brands believe creativity can scale naturally. It cannot.
In fashion and luxury, creativity is often protected as a talent to be preserved.
In reality, it is a function that must be governed.
As scale increases — more products, more teams, more markets — undisciplined creativity ceases to be a competitive advantage. It becomes a structural source of complexity, inconsistency and margin pressure.
​​​
​
Executive highlights​
​
-
Ungoverned creative direction is now an economic risk, not just an identity issue
-
Luxury value is increasingly concentrated in an extremely narrow top-tier segment
-
Without clear decision rights and decision gates, creativity loses both coherence and profitability
-
Brands that scale treat creativity as a strategic system, not as individual expression
The core issue: creativity without ownership
In many fashion and luxury organisations, creative direction occupies an ambiguous space:
culturally protected, emotionally charged, but operationally undefined.
-
Decision rights are unclear
-
Validation criteria are subjective
-
Accountability is diffuse
The result is systemic:
-
collections lose coherence season after season
-
brand codes shift unintentionally
-
teams interpret direction inconsistently
-
commercial functions are forced to compensate through discounting and complexity
The issue is not talent.
It is the absence of governance.
Market evidence:
Why creative discipline drives performance
Market evidence points to a structural transformation of luxury.
According to BCG – Altagamma True Luxury Global Consumer Insights 2025, value growth is increasingly driven by top-tier segments:
-
less sensitive to macroeconomic volatility
-
more demanding in terms of coherence, quality and execution
Value is no longer a function of volume.
It is a function of brand system credibility.
Value polarisation and top-tier logic in contemporary luxury
One data point makes this dynamic unequivocal.
Top-tier clients — an elite representing approximately 0.1% of global consumers — generate around 37% of total luxury market value, including capital-intensive categories such as luxury automotive, yachts and private aviation.
This fundamentally reshapes competitive logic:
-
value is highly concentrated
-
expectations are elevated
-
inconsistency is not tolerated
In these segments, as in luxury automotive or private aviation, excellence is the outcome of disciplined, governed systems built over time.
In fashion, the same logic now applies:
for top-tier clients, incoherent creativity is not an aesthetic risk — it is a reason for exclusion.
Today, value rewards discipline, not isolated expression.
Value concentration / BCG–Altagamma evidence.
​
A minimal share of clients captures a disproportionate share of luxury value.
Key implication
In such a concentrated market:
-
every ungoverned creative deviation erodes trust
-
every misalignment between creative direction, product and execution is immediately perceived
-
every downstream compromise directly impacts margins and economic resilience
Ungoverned creativity does not destroy value overnight.
It is gradually excluded from the segments that generate value.
The model:
Creative Governance Triangle
​
Brands that scale sustainably treat creative direction as a strategic discipline. The operating model rests on three pillars:
​
Brand Codes
Non-negotiable aesthetic principles, product DNA and visual language.
​
Decision Rights
Who defines direction, who validates, who has the authority to say no.
​
Decision Gates
Structured validation moments against explicit criteria.
Creative Governance Triangle
Field evidence
Creative drift during scale-up
In a high-end brand undergoing growth, increasing SKUs and channels progressively eroded collection coherence.
Creative direction was strong, but based on informal alignment.
The absence of clear decision gates resulted in:
-
variants unsupported by product architecture
-
continuous rework
-
margin pressure
The introduction of formalised brand codes and an Architecture sign-off gate restored control, reduced complexity and protected margins.
Core
decision gates
-
Architecture sign-off
coherence · margin · scalability -
Prototype & fit approval
quality · construction · industrial feasibility -
Collection freeze
pricing · margin integrity · market readiness -
Go-to-market release
channel · timing · execution risk​
​
Creativity is not debated continuously.
It is validated at specific moments, against shared criteria.
Creative decisions are validated at specific moments — not continuously debated.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
-
Ungoverned creative direction is a direct economic risk
-
Luxury value is concentrated in an extremely narrow top-tier segment
-
Creative coherence and discipline are now margin levers
-
Brands that scale govern creativity as a decision system
​
In contemporary luxury, competition is no longer about isolated novelty,
but about the ability to sustain a credible value promise over time.
Ungoverned creativity does not fail immediately.
It is simply excluded from the segments that generate value.
​​​
Market references
BCG–Altagamma, True Luxury Global Consumer Insights 2025
​​​
