REPORTED DEVELOPMENT

An undated case study describes 2025 results for an unnamed apparel/lifestyle business across ten brand-market combinations in the US, Canada and Japan. FindMine reports $888 million in influenced sales, 18% of online sales, 26% higher order value, 556% higher revenue per visit and 416% higher conversion for engaged versus non-engaged users, with automated stock-based substitutions.

The case study's publication date is not supplied.

WHY IT MATTERS TO THE MARKET

Engaged-versus-unengaged comparisons can involve self-selection. Influenced sales and observed differences do not establish incremental causal revenue or net ROI.

MARKET EVIDENCE

SOURCE-LINKED INDICATORS

The case study is a supplier-defined influenced-revenue attribution, not a controlled lift study.

$888MFindMine-influenced revenue reported for 2025VENDOR ATTRIBUTION2025 / Unidentified apparel/lifestyle client / 10 brand-marketsVendor-defined influenced revenue across ten brand-market implementations in an unnamed client portfolio; no randomised control or incremental-sales proof.FINDMINE / VIEW SOURCE
18%Claimed portfolio online-revenue contributionVENDOR ATTRIBUTION2025 / Share of site revenue exposed to FindMine influenceVendor-defined influenced revenue across ten brand-market implementations in an unnamed client portfolio; no randomised control or incremental-sales proof.FINDMINE / VIEW SOURCE
WHAT THE DATA SUGGESTS

For a future pilot, define unique exposed sessions, treatment controls, attribution window, category margin and deployment cost before treating the figures as an investment case.

INTERPRETATION BOUNDARY

Engaged versus non-engaged sessions differ by selection and intent. Influenced revenue is not incremental revenue; the customer is unnamed and the case study is undated.

ORIGINAL REFERENCES